not 100% clear
- redirected clicks ok but gallery/trade clicks not.
Example : I have an advertising with tracking url (so I must use "url=" that tracking will work). I have defined <domainname>/tp/out.php?link=adv_xxxx&p=100&url=<url> as outgoing like which should be 100% SKIM to that outgoing advertising - right ?
Additionaly for better couting I have added a trade (disabled) with the same domain name as used at the outgoing link path in the <url>. Shouldn't it be counted as "out" under this "trader" or/and as "click to trade" ?? If I will look on my trade stats (who will produce the clicks) the clicks will be counted (100% sure) as "gallery-click"
For example : within "popular links" I will see 10% clicks to toplist, 32% clicks to movie/text and 58% clicks to Advertising. On the trader stat (overall g.clicks, t.clicks) I will see 77% to gallery, 23% to trader. This 23% to trader would be like the default skim of the 32% of clicks to movie/text. But what about the rest ??
On trade stat I will see a skim of about 75% which will be a result that like "58% clicks to advertise" would be securely counted as gallery clicks - this looks so in my eyes but maybe I am wrong.
As result there are 2 questions :
.) why don't will be reflect the out clicks of advertising on the correct trade as "out" but surely as g.clicks on trader ?? is there a difference of trader/trader - maybe in fact of "disabled" ??
.) why I will get xx% to trade (as above 23% to trader) even the skim is not set to "default" and will have a "trade scheme" or should it be a problem if I don't use "p=/s=" within the links ?? Or it is a must to have a p=/s= on outgoing links that any skim scheme of a trade get active because it looks like as this that the trade don't will use the scheme but every time the defined "default skim" - is this right ??
thx a lot