Messages

1

Trade Pulse Support / Re: ScriptPulse needs your help: SUPPORT US with 2% of clicks!

« on: December 08, 2011, 05:16:38 AM »

Regarding new features we have some ideas for future. At the moment is there ANY feature we miss that will not do overload on server or over bloat our script with unused features? If you know some or anyone else we will do it ofcourse, what the heck we maybe even skipped some from feature requests after all we are not robots.

Nobody is a robot but if there is only 1 programmer behind it is more difficult to increase the ideas and fixes even mostly it is not the only work the programmer will do. Feature : example Multiserver/Heartbeat

I am also interested which trade script has more features then we do? Can you please name it?

I haven't said more features but there are similar scripts with like the same features (some different) like as from smartCJ.com otherwise a lot of users don't need a lot of features but some features (as I know it from my side) often are missing - not only in ScriptPulse.

Regarding updates, again, which script is more updated?

The sum of updates is the big point. An update with on stuff in my eyes isn't a recent update even it is only y "bug fix". Many scripts will do updates like aout each 3 month (as named above) but with a lot of stuff as shown in changelog. A high build number don't means there are a lot of updates - only that often there will be done a little bit to improve/fix the script.

Anyway thnx for critic, if you feel so bad that we take 2% msg me and we will make custom install which takes 1%.

The critic was more about the "paid model" as the whole branch is still a little bit in crisis and the sales are lower as a year before. So it is much harder to earn money even the user will sell the traffic on his own account like through "feeds".

Otherwise I don't know any script which will count 2% on that business. Some scripts - as I told before as many features are not important - are much cheaper in paid version. Still I will use older "free" versions which have the 1% and at the moment I guess I don't do an upgrade as still we don't support php 5.3 in fact of a lot of errors and in fact of this IonCube isn't important right now.

Why you don't - even you want to produce a good script - make a different paid-model to make difference to the business as this is the idea of the script ?? like this :

paid v1 (with all features) :   $250 ...
paid v2 (without network feature) : $150 ...
paid v3 (maybe some features less) : $100 ...
free v1 (1% skim) : $50 ...
free v2 (2% skim) : free

bye

2

Trade Pulse Support / Re: ScriptPulse needs your help: SUPPORT US with 2% of clicks!

« on: December 08, 2011, 03:30:11 AM »

> posted by bracey
> At 1% you get 30 clicks daily for $0.09 and it takes 555 days to get $50

we don't know how much FREE versions are still used but there are a lot and make a multiple of the clicks I don't guess they need more than a half day to get $50 based on this we will speak about $3000 each month or more - I'm wrong ?? How much will earning a programmer for a work of one of these scripts ? I don't think that he will get more than 1 month earnings todo it even ScriptPulse is based on old script with some modify.

ScriptPulse works well but other free ones will do it too. So why webmasters need to support someone to get much higher earnings as we don't will have it anyway. Maybe other marketing/sales line would be better to increase your earnings and don't let other working for you.

Maybe if ScriptPulse will release each week an update, new features or anything else it would be good to know that anyone will work hard for it but if we see the update history between each new build there is a lot of time but with low changing.

3

Trade Pulse Support / Re: Can't login after windows 7 updates

« on: April 24, 2011, 01:02:28 PM »

had same effect here on my sites since some days but SOLVED on my side.

Problem was that my Firefox has kicked out my special Proxy-Settings and as I had defined a IPs in my "White-List" in TP-Admin area I was unable to connect because my provider has changed the whole dynamic IP range which wasn't activated to connect at TP

@ ip0li : should be nice if there will be posted any error message on the login-screen like "not allowed to access" or "wrong password" or anything like this that it is better to know where the problem exist

4

Trade Pulse Bug Reports / trade.php - productivity missing

« on: October 04, 2010, 11:42:23 AM »

hi,

the "With productivity not less than" will not be shown on trade.php even it is checkboxed @ NewTraders form. I don't know if it will be since my update to 1.0.4 Build 22 today but maybe it will be missing since earlier version too.

the "Minimum hits required to start trade" will be shown correctly I have checked out both and added it again but without any effect to the "productivity"

bye

5

Trade Pulse Support / TP on cluster/cloud ??

« on: September 16, 2009, 08:25:52 AM »

has anyone successfully used or installed TradePulse on a loadbalancing/cluster/cloud system or has experiance with that ?? I mean not the content stuff - more the whole script directory with stats/etc. ??

thx

6

Trade Pulse Support / Re: All Time Ins And Outs In Toplist

« on: July 31, 2009, 09:54:04 AM »

you can feed that history information with "wget" and can produce your own toplist. Surely it is a little bit hardcore to crunch the important value data from the whole html code but it is a way you can do.

7

Trade Pulse Bug Reports / Re: JpGraph Error Message

« on: July 31, 2009, 09:50:45 AM »

some more : if you leave the checkbox on the general HistoryStats page blank you will get the same error if you will open the "Graph" or "History" stat on each trader. But on "Graph" stat you will get the "Productivity and Return by hours" graph even the checkbox on HistoryStats isn't activated.

8

Trade Pulse Bug Reports / JpGraph Error Message

« on: July 31, 2009, 08:15:17 AM »

if you don't choose any "Displayed data settings" on the HistoryPage you will get the attached error message. Please add some verify if something is checked before generating the graph 

9

Trade Pulse Support / Re: Negative numer in g.clicks and t.click

« on: July 31, 2009, 03:49:25 AM »

what kind of file permission even nothing has changed on the script side ?? i have same stuff sometimes but look like more as a not so good programmed mathematic stuff as like t.clicks - clicks = g.clicks so if clicks is higher than t.clicks you will get automatically a negative g.clicks count 

10

Trade Pulse Support / Re: what exaclty will handle some modifiers setting ...

« on: June 11, 2009, 04:21:45 PM »

For example: Any trade sending more than 20% or less than 2% of its traffic via proxies
It means that if trade has less then 2% or more then 20% proxy traffic from total INS it will be treated with lower ratio as setted in filed box...othervise it has normal ratio...
Is it clear now ?

depending ... ok I understand to send within another ratio. But why should I punish a trader who will send less than 2% of proxy traffic ?? It is nothing bad in my eyes event a trader will not send more than 5% of proxy traffic. So maybe I will be wrong, but should it not be only "more than 2% of proxy" and nothing more ??

11

Trade Pulse Support / Re: Traffic column no longer displays stats

« on: June 11, 2009, 04:12:41 PM »

is there any roadmap for the next release ??

12

Trade Pulse Support / Re: hit bot cheating

« on: June 11, 2009, 04:10:48 PM »

i guess i have both, hit bot cheater hits and normal hits in the nocookie stats. i don't think these hits from these bots should be considered "nocookie traffic" since i think they are not real surfers. please express your comments please.

sorry for late responce in fact of some holiday time. Don't use to send "nocookie" as normal hits or trading hits. Mostly you will find a lot of search engines like google-bot in nocookie section too. My experiance is that sometimes it can help to send the nocookie to a other own site and from that send it back ... like a circle ... because of most nocookie hits (as I know from my sites) are from search engines. so if you will have like 4 sites you can send it through that 4 sites to get better indexed in the search engines but never on not one site send it out to any other site if it isn't your own one.

13

Trade Pulse Support / Re: trades under 100% Production

« on: May 15, 2009, 12:03:38 AM »

no prob because I know that there are a lot of stupid webmaster outside and most of them will bid from you to give them a lot of but you never will get something back. I have seen a lot of like "closed communities" or/and "bigger networks" where it is very hard to trade with them as they have their noise up to the moon

14

Trade Pulse Support / Re: Correct hardlink tracking for trades

« on: May 14, 2009, 11:58:17 PM »

take a look to my thread http://forum.scriptpulse.com/index.php/topic,432.0.html because I guess the same that the "OUT" will not be counted as it should be and mostly will be counted as "gallery" traffic even if it isn't any kind of that because the backlink is defined as a trader.

15

Trade Pulse Support / Re: ProtonTM - ProgressTM - TradePulse

« on: May 14, 2009, 11:56:11 PM »

hi,

take a look to this thread : http://forum.scriptpulse.com/index.php/topic,388.0.html as I have asked some time before about the relation with kildoozer.

ad 1) money 
ad 2) I have tested all of them and a lot of other scripts too but not one is near of being "best". Like on a scale of 1 to 5 not any one has reached 1 and in general they are about 3 or lower. Each has good stuff and bad stuff but not any one fit perfectly for me (maybe for other) but sometimes I was thinking and have done a little bit already to programm my own one.

Sure if you don't have a lot of experiance ProtonTM or TradeScript are in my eyes some ones who will give you a very easy handling but with positive and negative effects. Right now on the scale for me I guess TradeScript is nearer to go to 2 because of some nice features but it doesn't fit for any bigger sited with a lot of traders. For last one I guess best is AT3/ATX but with not so much features but very stable and fast.

bye